Posts from September, 2009

On Stockings and Subterfuge: A Guest Post from Catherine of Kiss Me Deadly

One of the issues that has really snapped my garter in the past is how so many lingerie retailers repackage (and rename!) stockings from major hosiery manufacturers like Cervin.

Catherine, owner and designer of the much-loved lingerie label Kiss Me Deadly, recently sent me a very explanatory letter on exactly why so many companies do this.

I’ve copied and pasted her e-mail, with minimal editing, below, and I hope you find it as educational as I did. It really opened my eyes.

.__________________________________________________________________________________

“As you’ve noticed, Cervin makes a lot of other brands. . .anyone who can afford it, basically. This is called private label manufacturing, and it is not uncommon in the hosiery industry.  Most products you see come from just a few manufacturers. In Cervin’s case it’s more obvious because they have their own label, and because of the distinctive nature of their products. Another company makes most of the net hosiery for the quality brands, but you would never see their name unless you were in the trade, as they do none of their own branding whatsoever.

The reason they are used by so many is because they are the only reliable and high quality supplier of certain things, like silk and fully fashioned stockings. For certain weaves, they are simply the only people who can do them. Any time you see a name or a logo woven into a stocking top or a tight, for example, that’s Cervin. No one else can do it.

Anyway… as regards the pricing and the repackaging, it’s all about money. For starters, the markups (the amount of money you add to a products when selling) are lower in hosiery than in anything else. They’ve been further lowered by vicious competition from specialist websites run as hobbies, who don’t need to make enough to pay anyone there a living wage.

Re-branding is a way to stop people from comparing prices. It also stops your competitors from knowing where you source your products from, and, believe me, there’s always someone trying to copy.

Additionally, if you are having products made specifically for you, as some companies do, the cost per item might go down, but the initial outlay is huge. The minimum order for a catalogue product is 6 pairs. The minimum order for products made to your specifications is several hundred, preferably over a thousand, and in some cases more like 6000. To bring in several ranges in multiple colours and cover the full size range, as the larger companies often do, requires an initial investment that’s frankly terrifying if you’re as tiny as Kiss Me Deadly

Under those circumstances, this leaves you with a tricky equation—recouping your money as fast as possible (where it generally helps to sell cheaply), but also making sure the outlay was worth it (where you need to make as much money as possible).

On top of that, it’s not always obvious what the expensive bits of things are. For example, you mentioned one company that has a lace top version of something Cervin does in their own brand, and the price differential was quite high. That’s because, in fact, the lace is ridiculously expensive.

Of all the things Cervin does, the holdups are the most expensive, because they use costly French lace. It’s also because the silicone process is quite expensive too. If you check, you’ll find hold-ups and lace tops in most brands are the most expensive items, for this very reason…although the value brands buy much, much more inexpensive (and/or much less deep) lace, which significantly reduces prices. Deep lace costs significantly more to make.

Similarly, you might think a contrast foot on an FF wouldn’t be too different to a normal one, but, in fact, it requires that the machine be taken offline, filled with different yarn, and then brought back again. So it costs money because of the sheer amount of time involved – both staff time dealing with it, and time lost that could have been spent making catalogue products.

On the other hand making another cosmetic seam leg colour with a black foot/seam/welt is cheap-ish because its the same in griege as the current pink and nude legs. You make the change at the dying stage instead, so its just the dying minimums you have to worry about.

There’s also lots of complicated stuff about types of yarn used and exact weaving stuff, which I never have had much of a grip on, but basically you can’t always tell from the pictures whether they’ve done something clever and expensive, or whether its their standard stuff.

Even their standard stuff is pretty pricey though – the Cervin pure nylons use mono filament, which is authentically 50′s, whereas the remaining UK nylon manufacturers use multi-filament, stretchier but less vintage and far far more likely to catch and run. The problem is mono is harder to find and more expensive!

So, yes, I’m not sure if this is actually interesting or enlightening for you, but I thought I’d explain for reference purposes really.”

_____________________________________________________________

Trust me, Catherine, this was an extremely interesting and enlightening article. I not only feel like a better blogger, but also a better stockings consumer for knowing this information.

However, I can’t promise it’ll stop me from comparing prices…especially since I recognize Cervins by sight! ;-)

Sequined Hotpants: Yay or Nay?

While we’re on the subject of fashion trains I forgot to catch, I never really picked up the sequins trend. Ever since seeing these shiny knickers on Topshop, though, I’ve been wondering if I should expand my horizons.

What do you think? Sequined panties + white ribbed tank + sheer, backseam pantyhose? Or have I been drinking the Kool-Aid again? If it helps, here’s the look from the Chanel runway a couple of seasons back.

Suspender Pantyhose: Yay or Nay?

After 18 months of lingerie blogging, I feel pretty confident in saying I’ve worn almost every kind of underwear out there, no matter how extreme or eccentric. Yet, there’s one type of hosiery I haven’t tried yet–suspender pantyhose.Now, I’m finally thinking of giving them a shot. I’ve narrowed my choices down to three selections. What’s your favorite? Or should I leave these risqué tights alone all together?

 

Sheer Luxe Cut-Out Pantyhose
$28.00 at American Apparel

Wolford Individual 12 Stay-Hip Tights
$75.00 at Bare Necessities

Charnos Hosiery Boudoir Collection Bodyfree Pantyhose
$9.00 at Figleaves

Jonathan Aston Legwear: Fall/Winter 2009

Jonathan Aston is one my favorite budget hosiery brands. I love them because they replicate looks from the big luxury names like Wolford and Falke for less. A lot less.

With this year’s stunning collection, Jonathan Aston has shown they’re a force to be reckoned with in their own right. I see inspiration not only from Wolford, but also from the runway. Two tights in particular are reminiscent of looks from the major fashion labels Betsey Johnson and Rodarte.

I’ve posted a few of my favorites below, however the entire line is available from MyTights. Prices range from a very reasonable $12 up to $37 USD. I’m having a hard time deciding which one to buy first!








The Great Pandora’s Choice Stockings Giveaway!

That’s right, I said free stockings. Do I have your attention yet? ;-)

The very lovely Pandora of retro lingerie shoppe, Pandora’s Choice, is sponsoring a contest for my wonderful readers. One of you will be the lucky recipient of two pairs of seamed stockings in the colors nude and black.

To enter, all you have to do is say what item (or items!) from Pandora’s extensive closet you’d wear the stockings with. I’ll select a winner at random two weeks from now on October 10, 2009.

Good luck…I can’t wait to see what you all come up with!