A Lingerie Icon’s Last Gasp: Can Megan Fox Save Frederick’s of Hollywood?

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick's of Hollywood. Model wearing purple lingerie on the bed.

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick’s of Hollywood

Once upon a time, Frederick’s of Hollywood was the biggest name in American lingerie. Founded by Frederick Mellinger in 1947 (who, among other things, is credited with inventing the push-up bra, padded bra, and padded girdle), Frederick’s brought scandalously sexy lingerie to the homes of millions of people across America.

After generations of staid, respectable lingerie advertising (often, but not always, featuring the color white, that old-fashioned symbol of innocence and purity), Frederick’s helped make other colors, like black and red, less scandalous and more mainstream. Furthermore, Frederick’s was among the first established brand to market the concept of sexy lingerie to the masses. Before Frederick’s, one could only find that kind of intimate apparel through specialty retailers or in the back of fetish magazines.



Vintage Aubade Lingerie Advertisement featuring a floral bra and girdle with the model holding a rose.

Vintage Aubade Ad

One of the things that’s most striking about vintage Fredericks’ designs (apart from reminding us that people in the 1950s weren’t as puritanical as some like to assume) is how modern many of them are. Balconette bras, open cup styles, strappy knickers, corset lacing – while I won’t say Frederick’s invented these (strappy knickers have been around since at least the 1920s or 30s), the brand did help popularize them. Moreover, though it’s considered impolitic to say so, many brands today can attribute their aesthetic, in spirit or in fact, to designs Frederick’s of Hollywood made first.

It’s hard to see it now, but Frederick’s of Hollywood was the Victoria’s Secret of its day (an analogy that’s even more appropriate considering how VS has recently fallen upon hard times). They normalized the idea of lingerie shopping through a catalog, a concept which eventually led to modern day online lingerie retailers. They were among the first to play with “acceptable” sexiness, that is, a lingerie retailer the average consumer wouldn’t be ashamed to buy more boudoir-centric undergarments from.

Frederick’s was also the first dedicated lingerie chain to open in malls, exposing the brand to millions of potential consumers (and yet another strategy that future industry behemoth Victoria’s Secret would adopt wholeheartedly).

Vintage Frederick's of Hollywood items from the 1950s and 60s.

Vintage Frederick’s of Hollywood items, all of which have influenced modern-day undergarments

So what happened? How did Frederick’s of Hollywood go from being a market leader to an industry has-been? Well, it’s the same factors affecting Victoria’s Secret right now, to be honest – stale marketing and unoriginal products.

When Frederick’s of Hollywood designed their own lingerie, much of it was innovative and ground-breaking. The entire brand was built around the idea that any housewife or working woman in America could have a touch of that Hollywood glamour. Yet, as the decades passed, the company lost its way.

After going public in 1984, there was a stark change in both the brand’s direction and the presentation of its products. Some of that can be tied to the “more is more” aesthetic of the 1980s and early 90s. However, the fact remains that Frederick’s started to read as more of a “adult novelty” company instead of a lingerie company, the kiss of death in puritanical America. The glamour Frederick’s was once known for disappeared.

1991 Frederick's of Hollywood catalog page. What was sexy in the 1990s?

1991 Frederick’s of Hollywood catalog page

The issue, of course, is that once you’ve built a certain kind of brand, changing it won’t attract the customers you’re looking but will alienate the ones you had. That fact became more apparent as years went on. People who were old enough to remember when Frederick’s made French-style lingerie were understandably turned off by their newer, cheaper products. People who didn’t remember the previous version of Frederick’s could easily find similar goods for a lower price elsewhere or pay the same amount for better products.

The Dita Von Teese for Frederick's of Hollywood Collection. Burlesque-inspired lingerie for the holiday season.

The Dita Von Teese for Frederick’s of Hollywood Collection

What’s so tragic about the Frederick’s story is that the company had plenty of time to turn things around, and even made a few half-hearted efforts towards updating their image. The Dita Von Teese for Frederick’s of Hollywood Collection, released for Holiday 2007, received rave reviews and reminded many of Frederick’s glory days.

A later collection from around 2010/2011, the Icon by Frederick’s of Hollywood Collection resurrected several pieces from the archives like corselettes and overwire bras. Again, it received overwhelmingly positive feedback, but there was no follow through (in fact, Frederick’s backpedaled around this time with a special print catalog campaign…at a time when 80% of the brand’s customers were online).

Even the more recent Harriet collection, which was Frederick’s attempt to pivot into a higher-priced luxury market, was well-liked, and people responded favorably to their hiring of Maayan Zilberman, formerly of The Lake and Stars, as well.

The ICON by Frederick's of Hollywood Collection. Retro, vintage-inspired lingerie.

The ICON by Frederick’s of Hollywood Collection

In retrospect, the brand’s failure seems mystifying. Nostalgia for Frederick’s of Hollywood was high. New products seemed to perform well. However, the executives in charge of the company could never figure out what Frederick’s meant for the 21st century. More importantly, they never stuck with a new direction long enough to create the necessary momentum. Every new venture was a short-term experiment until they returned to the old, reliable approach…selling the same inexpensive lingerie already available on sites like Yandy and Trashy.

Frederick's of Hollywood compared with other budget sexy lingerie brands

Photos from Frederick’s on left; photos from other lingerie retailers on right

I still believe that, had Fredericks’ revisited their archives, invested in design, and established themselves as the original architects of sexy lingerie, they could have turned things around. But that never happened. The company closed all their stores and filed for bankruptcy in 2015, which brings us to today.

The announcement regarding Megan Fox and Frederick’s of Hollywood was made in late 2016. Megan Fox, who is perhaps best known for her role in the Transformers movie series, was touted as not only a spokesmodel but also a co-owner of the company.

In March 2017, the very first images of their new partnership debuted, and I’m sorry to say many of the same issues have reared their dull, uninspired heads.

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick's of Hollywood. Poolside model with strong makeup in black lingerie and stockings.

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick’s of Hollywood

While the campaign was shot by the incomparable Ellen Von Unwerth, it still doesn’t convey why or how Frederick’s of Hollywood is relevant today. I don’t feel a new concept here, a new direction or vision for the brand.

What does Frederick’s offer now that people can’t get from somewhere else? What about Megan Fox appeals to customers of today, many of whom actively embrace the “body positive” marketing of brands like Aerie (despite its faults)? Who exactly are these images meant to attract? A celebrity face can’t save a boring, uninspired product line. Just ask Britney Spears.

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick's of Hollywood. White lace bra and red lips.

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick’s of Hollywood

I have a hard time believing this campaign that will turn Frederick’s fortunes around. But I do believe there’s a lesson here for their once-rival and eventual usurper Victoria’s Secret. When the Angels campaign first launched in 1997, it put Victoria’s Secret on the metaphorical map. Supermodels in lingerie for a mass market brand? The ability to buy what the most famous fashion models of the day were wearing? And to purchase it from your own local mall? The effect was visceral. And it was unparalleled.

Appropriately, Victoria’s Secret doubled and then tripled down on this campaign, centering all of their marketing around the Angels, featuring them prominently in photo campaigns and press junkets and the world-famous fashion show. And America ate it up. Until they didn’t anymore.

Tyra Banks, Helena Christensen, Stephanie Seymour, Frederique van der Wal - VS Angels

An iconic photo of the Victoria’s Secret Angels in their heyday.

Victoria’s Secret is running into all the same problems Frederick’s once did. Once upon a time, VS’ marketing was revolutionary. Their products were seen as high-quality, luxury even (designers like Chantal Thomass used to design pieces for the brand). But gradually, they began losing touch with their market.

In a time when customers demanded bralettes, Victoria’s Secret promoted pushup bras. In an era where customers want to see more plus-sized models and models of color, Victoria’s Secret has yet to hire a single plus size model, and their Angels roster is still overwhelmingly white. Now even the free panty coupons aren’t enough to get people in stores, and Victoria’s secret’s stock is plummeting.

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick's of Hollywood. Model in a black lace lingerie set and stockings overlooking Hollywood.

Megan Fox by Ellen Von Unwerth for Frederick’s of Hollywood

However, I believe there’s still time left for VS to turn itself around. After all, market share doesn’t disappear overnight, and they’re still the leader of the U.S. lingerie industry. But if they don’t pay attention to the lessons of the past, they’re doomed to be another Frederick’s of Hollywood – passed by a young upstart, struggling to catch up, and wondering when the world left them behind.

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save


Article Tags :
Cora Harrington

Founder and Editor in Chief of The Lingerie Addict. I started TLA in a small studio apartment in 2008. Since then, it's become the leading lingerie blog in the world, and has been featured on the websites for Forbes, CNN, Time, Today, and Fox News. I believe lingerie is fashion too, and that every who wants it deserves gorgeous lingerie.

6 Comments on this post

  1. Chloe Taylor says:

    I can still remember the neighbors’ excited reactions when the latest FOH catalog arrived and was shared by (nearly) every mother who would put in a small, tantalizing order. 54-years later, I put my order in, completely oblivious of the serious decline at FOH. After 9-days of repeated emails and calls without connecting with an actual living human, I will never spend another penny on their merchandise. FOH wants me to pay return shipping for two defective items, and I refuse. This isn’t a case of changing my mind mid-stream – the products are defective. Fortunately, the credit card company is coming through for me, but I really don’t need this type of time-consuming frustration when there are so many alternatives.

    I’ll stick with Amazon and the ‘naughty’ store in town, which I was avoiding due to their prices – but in hindsight would have been the route to take. As for FOH, I have my fond memories, but I certainly don’t need their incompetence.

  2. Melody says:

    Maybe they’ll listen to you, Cora. I wholeheartedly agree that this is a case of being severely out of touch. But maybe it’s not so baffling, given that profit seems o be driving VS quality down beyond the imaginable and clearly the execs are operating in an old mode of trying to dictate what sexy and quality are to newly educated consumers who know what we want already. It really is a shame. That icon collection looks incredible.

  3. Jane says:

    Spot on! Amazing article!

  4. Lo says:

    The Frederick’s campaign looks very meh. I agree about staying current- people want lingerie they can see themselves in rather than this crazy high ideal.
    That being said, on a certain popular fetish website I am always interested in what people are wearing and was pleasantly surprised to find one of the pieces I stunned by was VS. The person wearing it was a full figured, gorgeous, woman and I would have bought the piece in a heartbeat had VS modeled it the way she was.

  5. Stephanie says:

    I stopped buying VS when they stopped making my size for most of their products, Fredericks just kind of went gaudy and cheap. VS seems to have defined their customer base as size xs to large. It also seems that lingerie manufacturers in general have gotten away from using satins and nylon as their main material and gone to mesh which I for one don’t buy and micro fibers that tend to make me to hot. La Senza isn’t any better. So I just keep my dollars for those purchases that tend to gravitate toward the indies.

  6. lia says:

    Wow, these last few articles in particular have been amazing! Looking forward to rereading them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *